Locally Specific Patterns of Chromatid and Chromosome Interference in Neurospora.

نویسندگان

  • C C Lindegren
  • G Lindegren
چکیده

NE of the fundamental problems concerning the mechanism of cross0 ing over is the question of chromatid interference. In the absence of chromatid interference the identity of the chromatids involved in two or more chiasmata or points of crossing over is random. Positive chromatid interference would exist if a crossover between one pair of chromatids reduced their chances of being involved in a second crossover with a resulting excess of 4-strand exchanges. Negative chromatid interference would exist if there was an excess of exchanges over that expected on a random basis in which a crossover between one pair of chromatids was followed by a second crossover between the same pair (a-strand exchange). The present paper and previous ones (LINDEGREN and LINDEGREN 1937, I 939) describe chromatid interference (non-random crossing over) in Neurospora. The conclusions reached in these studies are not in agreement with those of BEADLE and EMERSON (1935) on Drosophila. HUSKINS and NEWCOMBE (1941), however, demonstrated chromatid interference in Trillium by direct cytological observation. NEWCOMBE (1941) after a statistical analysis of BEADLE and EMERSON’S (1935) data, questions the validity of their interpretation. BONNIER and NORDENSKIOLD (193 7) failed to corroborate BEADLE and EMERSON’S findings. Our data show that when two crossovers occur symmetrically spaced on each side of the centromere, the same pair of strands is usually involved in each of the two exchanges, but in double exchanges involving certain other pairs of regions, the first exchange may interfere with a second exchange occurring between the same two chromatids. A pattern of exchanges involving negative chromatid interference between certain pairs of regions is associated with a pattern involving positive chromatid interference between other pairs of regions. There is a specific pattern characteristic of each pair of regions, and an excess of one type of exchange may occur between one pair of regions with a deficiency of that same type between another pair of regions. Directly related to the question of chromatid interference is the question of chromosome interference. If chromosome interference is positive,

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

I-35: Polar Body Analysis by Array CGH Identifies Women with Varying Susceptibility to Aneuploidy and Suggests that Non-disjunction Is Not The Predominant Mechanism Leading to Aneuploidy in Humans

Background: The maternal age effect for trisomy is well known. However what is less established is whether certain women are more (or less) prone to segregation errors, independent of age. Trisomy arises primarily through maternal meiosis I chromosome segregation errors however the precise mechanism by which these errors occur is unclear. Current dogma attributes the origin of trisomy to malseg...

متن کامل

Double Crossing over in Neurospora.

CROSSOVER involves exchange of genetic material between only two of the A four products of meiosis. We should like to know whether there are any special properties of these two strands of the tetrad which enable them to participate in crossing over. Such knowledge might help us understand the mechanics of the crossing over process and would perhaps shed some light on the physical nature of the ...

متن کامل

Propranolol induced chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cell line

Propranolol (PL), a non-selective beta-blocker, is a cardiovascular drug widely used to treat hypertension. The present study was concerned with assessing the cytogenetic effects of this drug on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line. MTT assay was then carried out to determine the cytotoxicity index (IC50) of the drug. The IC50 value of PL was 0.43±0.02 mM. To investigate the clastogenic effect...

متن کامل

An Analysis of Chiasma Pairs Showing Chromatid Interference in Trillium Erectum L.

NTIL comparatively recently there has been no compelling evidence U that genetic “interference” involves more than the occurrence of one crossover reducing the chance of another occurring in nearby regions. Genetic data from Drosophila have generally been interpreted as indicating that there is no “chromatid interference,” that is, that a crossover between two of the four chromatids does not in...

متن کامل

Crossing-over and interference in a multiply marked chromosome arm of Neurospora.

HE experiments reported here employ Neurospora tetrads for a type of invesT i g a t ion earlier carried out with multiply marked attached-X half-tetrads of Drosophila by EMERSON and BEADLE (1933), BEADLE and EMERSON (1935), BONNIER and NORDENSKIOLD (1937) and WELSHONS (1955), within the theoretical framework developed by such workers as E. G. ANDERSON, C. B. BRIDGES, and A. WEINSTEIN (see WEINS...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Genetics

دوره 27 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1942